5 Simple Statements About case laws on 493 crpc pakistan Explained
5 Simple Statements About case laws on 493 crpc pakistan Explained
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Case law is specific to your jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For instance, a ruling within a California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair on the offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not use, as being the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, instead he is acquitted in the criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is properly-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted from the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment via the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all long run purposes. The aforesaid proposition has long been established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan from the case of your District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. Within the meantime police shall remain neutral inside the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall choose prompt action against them under law. 5. The moment petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and proficiently.
However it truly is made obvious that police is free to get action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities matter to law. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also guarantee respect on the family lose in accordance with regulation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate to be a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been achieved. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated higher than. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi website Coming into the main case, It's also a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It can be nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case legislation in a particular court. Indeed, Each individual circuit has its individual set of binding case legislation. Consequently, a judgment rendered from the Ninth Circuit will not be binding in the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
Any court may possibly search for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of such a distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
Because of their position between the two main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as combined systems of regulation.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but can be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.